PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE

The connection between traditional literary methods and psychological science has long been of interest to researchers, particularly the problem of interaction of poetics as a ,science of artistry with psycholinguistics is especially relevant. The prospects of this approach are explained by the fact that language as the main building material of literature is an act of mental activity. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate the synergetic effect of the interaction of receptive poetics and psycholinguistics in the study of the literary text artistry. The depiction of the expressive system of Pavlo Tychyna’s landscape miniature The Rain has been done by way of studying the recipient‘s psychology of text perception. In the poetic text, many techniques have been identified that evoke figurative representations in the recipient’s mind, thus forming a complete visual picture. It has been analyzed how the picture of rain gradually emerges in the reader’s imagination: from the first drops to the strengthening and subsidence, ending with a cathartic state. It has been observed how figurative representations generate the accordant emotional states. The particular attention is paid to the functionality of the tool termed as the principle of the reverse funnel. The analysis of P. Tychyna’s poem The Rain with the use of the tools both of receptive poetics and psycholinguistics has demonstrated high efficiency of such a binary approach, thus confirming its promising perspectives in contemporary philological research.

• Barabash, Y. (1972). Eti neulovimye struktury [These elusive structures]. Inostrannaya literatura, 4, 203-211.

• Bieliekhova, L., & Tsapiv, A. (2019). Cognitive play model of narration “Quest” in Roald Dahl’s Fairy Tale Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-11-30

• Blauberg, I., & Judin, E. (1973). Stanovlenie i sushchnost sistemnogo podkhoda [Formation and essence of the system approach]. Nauka.

• Eikhenbaum, B. (1924). Skvoz literaturu [Through the literature]. Academia.

• Foka, M. (2013). Stratehii perekladu syntetychnykh obraziv Pavla Tychyny anhliiskoiu movoiu [Strategies for English translation of Pavlo Tychyna’s synthetic images]. Anturazh A.

• Franko, I. (1981). Iz sekretiv poetychnoi tvorchosti [From the secrets of poetic creativity]. In Ye. Kyryliuk (Ed.), Tvory (Vol. 31; pp. 45-119). Naukova dumka.

• Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2019). What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary experience? Scientific Study of Literature, 9(1), 72-103. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.18009.gib

• Hennequin, É. (1888). La critique scientifique [Scientific criticism]. Perrin et Cie, Libraires-éditeurs.

• Hilmi, G. (1967). Logika poezii [The logic of poetry]. Voprosy filosofii, 11, 111-119.

• Hodunok, Z. (2018). The physical discourse of fan fiction. Psycholinguistics, 24, 11-28. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-2-11-28

• Klochek, H. (2020). Synerhiia literaturnoho tvoru [Synergy of a literary work]. Seredniak T. K. Printing House.

• Kolmogorov, A. N. (2015). Trudy po stikhovedeniyu [Works on poetry]. MCCME.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1907). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 1). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1909). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 2, iss. 1). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1910). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 2, iss. 2). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1911). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 3). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1913). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 4). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1914). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 5). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1915). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 6, iss. 1). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1916). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 7). Mirnyy trud.

• Lezin, B. A. (Ed.). (1923). Voprosy teorii i psikhologii tvorchestva [Questions of the theory and psychology of creativity] (Vol. 8). Mirnyy trud.

• Lotman, J. (1972). Analiz poeticheskogo teksta. Struktura stikha [Analysis of the poetic text. Verse structure]. Prosveshchenie.

• Mahlberg, M., Conklin, K., & Biscon, M.-J. (2014). Reading Dicken’s characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts. Language and Literature, 23(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014543887

• Nikiforova, O. (1947). Rol predstavleniy v vospriyatii slova, frazy i khudozhestvennogo opisaniya [The role of representations in the perception of words, phrases and artistic description]. Izvestiya APN RSFSR, 7, 121-162.

• Platonov, K. (1957). Slovo kak fiziologicheskiy i lechebnyy factor [The word as a physiological and therapeutic factor]. Medgiz.

• Potebnja, A. (1894). Iz lektsiy po teorii slovesnosti. Basnya. Poslovitsa. Pogovorka [From lectures on the theory of literature. Fable. Proverb. Saying]. K. Schasni Printing House.

• Potebnja, A. (1905). Iz zapisok po teorii slovesnosti [From notes on the theory of literature]. M. V. Potebnja Printing House.

• Rasse, C., Onysko, O., & Citron, F. (2020). Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 12(2), 310-342. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a43p8

• Saliamon, L. S. (1971). Elementy fiziologii i khudozhestvennoe vospriyatie [Elements of physiology and artistic perception]. In B. S. Meylakh (Ed.), Khudozhestvennoe vospriyatie (pp. 98-113). Nauka.

• Simonov, P. V. (1962). Metod K.S. Stanislavskogo i fiziologiya emotsiy [K. S. Stanislavsky’s method and the physiology of emotions]. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

• Suvorova, T. (2020). The discursive metonymy in the imagery of American folklore ballads. Psycholinguistics, 27, 229-251. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-2-229-251

• Tychyna, P. (2020). The Rain (M. M. Naydan, Trans.). In M. Prykhoda (Ed.), The complete early poetry collections of Pavlo Tychyna (p. 71). Litopys.

• Vinogradov, V. (1959). O yazyke khudozhestvennoy literatury [About the language of fiction]. Goslitizdat.

• Vygotsky, L. (1965). Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Iskusstvo.